Antigravity AI vs Cursor: Which is Better?
Both Antigravity AI and Cursor are powerful AI coding assistants, but they serve different purposes. Here's a comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right tool.
| Feature | Antigravity AI | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anysphere | |
| AI Model | Gemini 2.0 | GPT-4 / Claude |
| Agentic Capabilities | ✓ Advanced | ~ Limited |
| Codebase Understanding | ✓ Excellent | ✓ Excellent |
| Multi-file Editing | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Custom Rules Support | ✓ Extensive | ~ Basic |
| Pricing | Free (Beta) | $20/month |
Key Differences
🚀 Antigravity AI Strengths
- ✓True agentic behavior - can work autonomously
- ✓Powered by latest Gemini 2.0 model
- ✓Extensive custom rules (.antigravity files)
- ✓Free during beta period
⚡ Cursor Strengths
- ✓Mature product with proven reliability
- ✓Choice of GPT-4 or Claude models
- ✓Excellent inline code suggestions
- ✓Large community and resources
When to Choose Antigravity AI
Choose Antigravity AI if you:
- →Want true agentic AI that can work autonomously
- →Need advanced multi-file refactoring capabilities
- →Want to define extensive custom rules and workflows
- →Prefer Google's latest Gemini 2.0 model
When to Choose Cursor
Choose Cursor if you:
- →Need a production-ready tool with proven stability
- →Want to switch between GPT-4 and Claude
- →Prefer a more traditional IDE experience
- →Value a large existing community
Conclusion
Both tools are excellent choices, and many developers use them together! Antigravity AI excels at autonomous, multi-step tasks and complex refactoring, while Cursor provides a more traditional, reliable coding assistant experience.